In the realm of political philosophy, few ideas are as pervasive and unchallenged as the belief that some individuals possess the inherent right to govern others. This belief underpins the very foundation of the state, which is often seen as a legitimate authority capable of creating and enforcing laws that bind everyone within its jurisdiction. However, from a Voluntaryist perspective, this belief is nothing more than a socially constructed fantasy—a form of superstition that, like any religion, relies on rituals, symbols, and the coercive power of its adherents to sustain itself.
The State as a Mental and Social Construct
The idea that certain individuals have the right to rule over others is a mental construct—a set of ideas and assumptions that have been created, accepted, and perpetuated by society over time. This belief system, much like a religion, is built on the notion that authority and power can be legitimately held by a select few, and that these few have the right to impose their will on everyone else.
Consider the various mental constructs that underpin this belief system: the idea that a person can be "elected" to a position of power, that a piece of paper signed by a ruler or a legislature can create binding laws, or that a uniform or a title confers special rights. These are all abstractions, invented by humans, and they only hold power because people believe in them. Just as in a religion, where rituals, sacred texts, and religious offices are seen as sources of divine authority, the rituals of state—elections, oaths of office, and the enforcement of laws—are seen as sources of political authority. But strip away the belief, and what remains are just people, no different from any others, claiming rights they do not inherently possess.
This socially constructed belief system is maintained through a combination of tradition and coercion. It is passed down through generations, taught in schools, reinforced by the media, and enshrined in legal and political institutions. From a young age, individuals are conditioned to accept the state’s authority as legitimate and necessary, much like how religious beliefs are instilled in the faithful. Over time, this belief becomes so deeply ingrained that it is rarely questioned, and those who do challenge it are often dismissed as radicals or outcasts.
The Voluntaryist Rejection of State Authority
As Voluntaryists, we reject this fantasy. We do not believe that any person has the inherent right to rule over another, nor do we accept the idea that some people can possess rights—such as the right to use force, to tax, or to imprison—that others do not. To us, these are artificial distinctions, created by society and enforced through coercion. We believe in the equal rights of all individuals, and that no one has the moral authority to dominate or control others without their consent.
In a truly free society, all interactions would be voluntary, based on mutual consent and respect. No one would have the right to impose their will on others through force or coercion. Instead, people would organize their lives according to their own values and principles, forming communities, businesses, and relationships that reflect their individual choices. This is the essence of Voluntaryism—a belief in a society where the use of force is only justified in self-defense, and where all human interactions are based on voluntary cooperation rather than imposed authority.
The Coercive Nature of the State
However, the belief system of state authority does not tolerate dissent. Those who reject it—those who refuse to recognize the legitimacy of rulers and their laws—are often met with coercion, force, and subjugation. The state, like any organized group of believers, is willing to use violence to maintain its power and to impose its beliefs on others. This is evident in the way laws are enforced: through police, courts, and prisons. If you do not comply with the state's edicts, you are fined, arrested, or imprisoned. If you resist, you may be met with physical violence.
The state operates much like a religious institution that punishes heresy. Non-believers—those who do not accept the state's authority—are treated as outcasts or criminals, to be corrected or eliminated. The state's use of violence is justified by its adherents as necessary to maintain order, just as religious violence has often been justified as necessary to maintain the faith. But from a Voluntaryist perspective, this is nothing more than the suppression of free thought and free will, an attempt to force conformity to a belief system that we do not share.
The State as a Form of Religious Fanaticism
In this light, the belief in the right to rule and the acceptance of state power can be seen as a form of religious faith—a belief in a higher power that dictates how one must live, even if that power is merely other people dressed in the trappings of authority. Those who insist that everyone must subscribe to this belief, and that non-believers should be punished, are acting no differently than religious fanatics who demand conformity to their creed.
Consider, for example, how governments are formed: through elections where the majority's will is treated as sacrosanct, even if the minority views the process as flawed or the outcome as unjust. The laws that are passed by these governments are enforced through coercion, with penalties imposed on those who do not conform, regardless of their personal beliefs or values. This mirrors the behavior of religious zealots who, throughout history, have sought to impose their beliefs on others through force, punishment, and ostracism.
Ultimately, if you adhere to the idea that some people have the right to impose their will on others through laws and governance, and that those who disagree must be coerced into compliance, you are embracing a form of fanaticism that rests on the unquestioning acceptance of authority as an end in itself.
A Call for Voluntaryism
In contrast to this belief system, Voluntaryism offers a vision of a society where individuals are free to live their lives according to their own values, without being subject to the coercive force of the state or any other imposed authority. We advocate for a world where all interactions are voluntary, based on mutual respect and consent. In such a society, no one would have the power to rule over others, and no one would be forced to submit to the will of another.
As Voluntaryists, we recognize that this vision is not compatible with the current system of state authority, which is maintained through coercion, violence, and the perpetuation of a belief system that grants some people power they do not morally possess. However, we believe that by challenging these mental and social constructs, and by refusing to participate in the coercive systems that uphold them, we can begin to create a society based on true freedom and equality.
In conclusion, the state and its authority are not objective truths but socially constructed belief systems, maintained through coercion and violence. As Voluntaryists, we reject these constructs and advocate for a society where all interactions are voluntary and based on mutual consent. We believe that no one has the right to rule over another, and that the only legitimate interactions between individuals are those that are freely chosen. It is through this lens that we view the state not as a necessary institution, but as a form of organized religion—one that demands blind faith in its authority and punishes those who refuse to believe.
Comments